Paraguay tea in intercrop with chinaberry tree and “louro-pardo”

Authors

  • Paulo Alfonso Floss Epagri/Centro de Pesquisa para Agricultura Familiar (Cepaf)
    • Dorli Mário Da Croce Epagri/Centro de Pesquisa para Agricultura Familiar
      • Cristiano Nunes Nesi Epagri/Centro de Pesquisa para Agricultura Familiar

        DOI:

        https://doi.org/10.52945/rac.v22i2.820

        Keywords:

        Ilex paraguariensis, Melia azedarach, Cordia trichotoma, sistemas agroflorestais

        Abstract

        The objective of this research was to evaluate the yield of Paraguay tea (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hil.),
        a South American native tree of the Aquifoliaceae family, planted in different intercropping densities with chinaberry tree (Melia azedarach L.) and “louro-pardo” (Cordia trichotoma Vellozo Arrabida ex Steudel.). Six different plant spacing arrangements were used for chinaberry tree and “louro-pardo”, while he Paraguay tea
        was planted in the rows by using two, three or four seedlings depending on the inter-row space. The Paraguay tea was evaluated in August 2002 and December 2003 by quantifying the total plots production. In July 2005 an individual evaluation of all plants in the plots was carried out. The chinaberry tree and the “louro-pardo” were
        evaluated only once (July 2005) by taking measures of the diameter at breast height (DBH), height and diameter of plant canopy. It was possible to observe that the shade produced by the chinaberry tree affected the production of Paraguay tea. The spacing for the plantation of chinaberry tree and “louro-pardo” affected the yield of Paraguay
        tea due to the variation of its population. The highest yield of Paraguay tea was obtained with “louro-pardo” in the density of 941 plants/ha.

        Downloads

        Download data is not yet available.

        Published

        2009-12-22

        Issue

        Section

        Scientific article

        How to Cite

        Paraguay tea in intercrop with chinaberry tree and “louro-pardo”. (2009). Agropecuária Catarinense Journal, 22(2), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.52945/rac.v22i2.820